Dirty Money: Transactional Pagan Writings

Exploring Pagans and their relationship with that earthiest of earth symbols, money.

  • Home
    Home This is where you can find all the blog posts throughout the site.
  • Tags
    Tags Displays a list of tags that have been used in the blog.
  • Bloggers
    Bloggers Search for your favorite blogger from this site.
  • Login
    Login Login form

Money magic: is money the means or the goal?

There's been a lot of talk about money in the Pagan blogosphere in the past week, so much so that I wonder if it would be a service simply to round up those links once in awhile.  I'm barely making my self-imposed "money Monday" deadline this week as it is -- missed it, in some time zones -- so I won't be giving that idea another moment's thought quite yet.

One of the posts that really caught my eye comes from my fellow blogger here, Carl Neal, who cajoled readers to contribute to your favorite Pagan efforts.  One of Neal's personal favorites is the Wild Hunt blog, which is presently running its annual fund drive.  With four weeks left in the campaign, 108% of the needed funds to pay for servers, columnists, and administration have been raised.  In an early thank-you note, Jason Pitzl-Waters remarks, "Fundraising is a spell."  I agree, but I'm not sure it's the kind of spell most people might think it is.

There are many money spells.  Spells to draw wealth, build business, protect the money we already have from thieves and spendthrifts.  Spells to hunt money and spells to protect it from swindlers.  The one common thread that runs through virtually all money magic is that money is the target:  bring it, multiply it, protect it, find it, hide it.

But if we take the premise that money is congealed energy -- and I do, because money is gained largely in exchange for something of value, and value is only created through the energy of effort, making money a store of energy economically as well as magically -- then spells to accumulate money and prevent it from dissipating might not be the best idea.

What would it be like to hold a ritual for the express purpose of raising a cone of power?  Not raising a cone of power to send energy to heal the earth or a loved one with cancer, or to open a way between worlds . . . no, just raising it to raise it, and then keep it there.

If you're a practicing Wiccan or are otherwise familiar with raising energy as a group, that probably sounds ridiculous.  Raising power itself is not the goal; you've got to do something with it, right?

So too is it with money.  There is a reason why there aren't a lot of stupendously wealthy magical practitioners . . . you have to have a goal for the energy (e.g., the money) or it's only half a spell.  There's no intent, just raising of energy.

As I see it, fundraising is indeed a spell.  The intention was set clearly, the call was raised, and because of the number of focused people involved, there will be energy in abundance for this work.  It succeeds for many reasons, including people like Mr. Neal stepping up and contributing their own energy.  It succeeds because the raising of the energy isn't the point; providing a Pagan perspective is.

What will it look like to use money as means, rather than goal, of a spell?  The work will involve giving, rather receiving, as in my forgiveness ritual, for what is magic if there isn't a release of energy?  I have to think that there's more to gained by using money as the means to an end, rather than an end in itself.

Last modified on
Rate this blog entry:
1

Terence P Ward is a business writer and journalist who blogs under the rather cumbersome moniker of True Pagan Warrior.  He can generally be found at home, tending to his gardens and the many demands of his cats; in the alternative, follow TPW on Facebook

Comments

  • Jamie
    Jamie Wednesday, 30 October 2013

    Mr. Ward,

    I frequently read the "Zero Hedge" website. Whilst it has its share of ideologues and cranks, both the articles and the comments often yield interesting (if not useful to me personally) facts.

    Many people who are involved in the uppermost tier of the financial services industry are referred to as "sociopaths". Why? We both know. It's just like you said. They accumulate that power, that congealed energy, that money, with no other intent but to have more. All other things in life take a back seat to that one singular goal. Surely that's a sort of magic all its own, though few but us would call it such.

    "Only the little people pay taxes."

    We will never have the late Leona Helmsley's wealth, and surely many of those who do are not sociopaths. But I often wonder how many people in that income bracket secretly feel the same way.

    I'd rather be me, flaws and all.

    Thanks again for sharing another really good post with us!

  • Terence P Ward
    Terence P Ward Wednesday, 30 October 2013

    Off to check out this website for myself!

  • Please login first in order for you to submit comments

Additional information