We be of one blood, you and I.
Animals have gender.
Animals—by which I mean, of course, non-human animals—are male and female, just like we are.*
Why then, in English, do we refer to animals as “it”?
If you think that there are religious implications here, you're right.
“Animals” are our kin. As such, they deserve to be accorded dignity and treated with respect.
As such, they deserve to be spoken of as he or she, not it.
-
Yes, thank Goddess English shed its grammatical genders 1000 years ago, as Old English morphed into Middle. But no, there's no con
-
The distinction between (biological) sex and (ascribed) gender that you speak of is a function of the human animal. Quite.
-
I'm afraid you're confusing gender with biological sex. Gender is grammatical, a product of language, which is a product of cultur
-
Thanks, Virginia: the better that we know others, the better we know ourselves. That said, in the nature of things, we're probabl
-
Well, if you are discussing mammals and birds, yes. With snails and slugs, they are either "it" or "both gendered." Going further